csl antibody 5313 Search Results


95
Bio-Techne corporation human ciap-1/hiap-2 antibody
Human Ciap 1/Hiap 2 Antibody, supplied by Bio-Techne corporation, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/human ciap-1/hiap-2 antibody/product/Bio-Techne corporation
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
human ciap-1/hiap-2 antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

95
Cell Signaling Technology Inc csl antibody
(A) HKCs reverse transfected with siRNAs against <t>CSL</t> or scrambled control were analyzed 1 week later (in differentiating condition) by qRT-PCR and immunoblot of the indicated genes and proteins. mRNA levels were normalized to reference ribosomal gene RPLP0, and presented as mean fold-change over control ± S.E.M. n=3. ** p< 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p<0.0001, Hes1, Keratin 10 and Involucrin were used as indicators of endogenous Notch activity, γ-tubulin served as loading control. (B) Differentiating HKCs were treated with DAPT (10μM) or DMSO control for 72 hours followed by qRT-PCR and immunoblot analysis of the indicated genes and proteins. The analysis was done as in (A). **** p<0.0001, n=3. (C) Proliferating HKCs were infected with retroviruses expressing activated Notch1 or GFP followed, 72 hours later, by qRT-PCR and immunoblot analysis of AQP3. Hey1 was used as an indicator of endogenous Notch activity. The analysis was done as in (A). * p<0.05, *** p<0.001, n=3. (D) Chromatin <t>immuno-precipitation</t> <t>(ChIP)</t> analysis of CSL binding to the regulatory region of the AQP3 gene. Left panel: schematic representation of the AQP3 gene locus based on ChIP-seq information on different chromatin states as provided by the ENCODE project. The location of CSL binding site in the AQP3 gene was analyzed using Mat-inspector software. Right panel: HKCs were processed for ChIP analysis using CSL antibody or non immune IgG. Results are expressed as mean fold of enrichment ± S.E.M. n=2, for each indicated binding site, after immunoprecipitation with CSL antibody or non immune IgG, relative to enrichment for the negative control region.
Csl Antibody, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/csl antibody/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
csl antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Cell Signaling Technology Inc csl antibody 5313
(A) HKCs reverse transfected with siRNAs against <t>CSL</t> or scrambled control were analyzed 1 week later (in differentiating condition) by qRT-PCR and immunoblot of the indicated genes and proteins. mRNA levels were normalized to reference ribosomal gene RPLP0, and presented as mean fold-change over control ± S.E.M. n=3. ** p< 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p<0.0001, Hes1, Keratin 10 and Involucrin were used as indicators of endogenous Notch activity, γ-tubulin served as loading control. (B) Differentiating HKCs were treated with DAPT (10μM) or DMSO control for 72 hours followed by qRT-PCR and immunoblot analysis of the indicated genes and proteins. The analysis was done as in (A). **** p<0.0001, n=3. (C) Proliferating HKCs were infected with retroviruses expressing activated Notch1 or GFP followed, 72 hours later, by qRT-PCR and immunoblot analysis of AQP3. Hey1 was used as an indicator of endogenous Notch activity. The analysis was done as in (A). * p<0.05, *** p<0.001, n=3. (D) Chromatin <t>immuno-precipitation</t> <t>(ChIP)</t> analysis of CSL binding to the regulatory region of the AQP3 gene. Left panel: schematic representation of the AQP3 gene locus based on ChIP-seq information on different chromatin states as provided by the ENCODE project. The location of CSL binding site in the AQP3 gene was analyzed using Mat-inspector software. Right panel: HKCs were processed for ChIP analysis using CSL antibody or non immune IgG. Results are expressed as mean fold of enrichment ± S.E.M. n=2, for each indicated binding site, after immunoprecipitation with CSL antibody or non immune IgG, relative to enrichment for the negative control region.
Csl Antibody 5313, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/csl antibody 5313/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
csl antibody 5313 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Millipore chip assay kit
(A) HKCs reverse transfected with siRNAs against CSL or scrambled control were analyzed 1 week later (in differentiating condition) by qRT-PCR and immunoblot of the indicated genes and proteins. mRNA levels were normalized to reference ribosomal gene RPLP0, and presented as mean fold-change over control ± S.E.M. n=3. ** p< 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p<0.0001, Hes1, Keratin 10 and Involucrin were used as indicators of endogenous Notch activity, γ-tubulin served as loading control. (B) Differentiating HKCs were treated with DAPT (10μM) or DMSO control for 72 hours followed by qRT-PCR and immunoblot analysis of the indicated genes and proteins. The analysis was done as in (A). **** p<0.0001, n=3. (C) Proliferating HKCs were infected with retroviruses expressing activated Notch1 or GFP followed, 72 hours later, by qRT-PCR and immunoblot analysis of AQP3. Hey1 was used as an indicator of endogenous Notch activity. The analysis was done as in (A). * p<0.05, *** p<0.001, n=3. <t>(D)</t> <t>Chromatin</t> immuno-precipitation <t>(ChIP)</t> analysis of CSL binding to the regulatory region of the AQP3 gene. Left panel: schematic representation of the AQP3 gene locus based on ChIP-seq information on different chromatin states as provided by the ENCODE project. The location of CSL binding site in the AQP3 gene was analyzed using Mat-inspector software. Right panel: HKCs were processed for ChIP analysis using CSL antibody or non immune IgG. Results are expressed as mean fold of enrichment ± S.E.M. n=2, for each indicated binding site, after immunoprecipitation with CSL antibody or non immune IgG, relative to enrichment for the negative control region.
Chip Assay Kit, supplied by Millipore, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/chip assay kit/product/Millipore
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
chip assay kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Cell Signaling Technology Inc igg 56383 antibody
(A) HKCs reverse transfected with siRNAs against CSL or scrambled control were analyzed 1 week later (in differentiating condition) by qRT-PCR and immunoblot of the indicated genes and proteins. mRNA levels were normalized to reference ribosomal gene RPLP0, and presented as mean fold-change over control ± S.E.M. n=3. ** p< 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p<0.0001, Hes1, Keratin 10 and Involucrin were used as indicators of endogenous Notch activity, γ-tubulin served as loading control. (B) Differentiating HKCs were treated with DAPT (10μM) or DMSO control for 72 hours followed by qRT-PCR and immunoblot analysis of the indicated genes and proteins. The analysis was done as in (A). **** p<0.0001, n=3. (C) Proliferating HKCs were infected with retroviruses expressing activated Notch1 or GFP followed, 72 hours later, by qRT-PCR and immunoblot analysis of AQP3. Hey1 was used as an indicator of endogenous Notch activity. The analysis was done as in (A). * p<0.05, *** p<0.001, n=3. <t>(D)</t> <t>Chromatin</t> immuno-precipitation <t>(ChIP)</t> analysis of CSL binding to the regulatory region of the AQP3 gene. Left panel: schematic representation of the AQP3 gene locus based on ChIP-seq information on different chromatin states as provided by the ENCODE project. The location of CSL binding site in the AQP3 gene was analyzed using Mat-inspector software. Right panel: HKCs were processed for ChIP analysis using CSL antibody or non immune IgG. Results are expressed as mean fold of enrichment ± S.E.M. n=2, for each indicated binding site, after immunoprecipitation with CSL antibody or non immune IgG, relative to enrichment for the negative control region.
Igg 56383 Antibody, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/igg 56383 antibody/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
igg 56383 antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
GeneTex anti-rabbit ku70 polyclonal antibody cat. 101820
(A) HKCs reverse transfected with siRNAs against CSL or scrambled control were analyzed 1 week later (in differentiating condition) by qRT-PCR and immunoblot of the indicated genes and proteins. mRNA levels were normalized to reference ribosomal gene RPLP0, and presented as mean fold-change over control ± S.E.M. n=3. ** p< 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p<0.0001, Hes1, Keratin 10 and Involucrin were used as indicators of endogenous Notch activity, γ-tubulin served as loading control. (B) Differentiating HKCs were treated with DAPT (10μM) or DMSO control for 72 hours followed by qRT-PCR and immunoblot analysis of the indicated genes and proteins. The analysis was done as in (A). **** p<0.0001, n=3. (C) Proliferating HKCs were infected with retroviruses expressing activated Notch1 or GFP followed, 72 hours later, by qRT-PCR and immunoblot analysis of AQP3. Hey1 was used as an indicator of endogenous Notch activity. The analysis was done as in (A). * p<0.05, *** p<0.001, n=3. <t>(D)</t> <t>Chromatin</t> immuno-precipitation <t>(ChIP)</t> analysis of CSL binding to the regulatory region of the AQP3 gene. Left panel: schematic representation of the AQP3 gene locus based on ChIP-seq information on different chromatin states as provided by the ENCODE project. The location of CSL binding site in the AQP3 gene was analyzed using Mat-inspector software. Right panel: HKCs were processed for ChIP analysis using CSL antibody or non immune IgG. Results are expressed as mean fold of enrichment ± S.E.M. n=2, for each indicated binding site, after immunoprecipitation with CSL antibody or non immune IgG, relative to enrichment for the negative control region.
Anti Rabbit Ku70 Polyclonal Antibody Cat. 101820, supplied by GeneTex, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/anti-rabbit ku70 polyclonal antibody cat. 101820/product/GeneTex
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti-rabbit ku70 polyclonal antibody cat. 101820 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Millipore anti-mouse flag-m2 monoclonal antibody
(A) HKCs reverse transfected with siRNAs against CSL or scrambled control were analyzed 1 week later (in differentiating condition) by qRT-PCR and immunoblot of the indicated genes and proteins. mRNA levels were normalized to reference ribosomal gene RPLP0, and presented as mean fold-change over control ± S.E.M. n=3. ** p< 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p<0.0001, Hes1, Keratin 10 and Involucrin were used as indicators of endogenous Notch activity, γ-tubulin served as loading control. (B) Differentiating HKCs were treated with DAPT (10μM) or DMSO control for 72 hours followed by qRT-PCR and immunoblot analysis of the indicated genes and proteins. The analysis was done as in (A). **** p<0.0001, n=3. (C) Proliferating HKCs were infected with retroviruses expressing activated Notch1 or GFP followed, 72 hours later, by qRT-PCR and immunoblot analysis of AQP3. Hey1 was used as an indicator of endogenous Notch activity. The analysis was done as in (A). * p<0.05, *** p<0.001, n=3. <t>(D)</t> <t>Chromatin</t> immuno-precipitation <t>(ChIP)</t> analysis of CSL binding to the regulatory region of the AQP3 gene. Left panel: schematic representation of the AQP3 gene locus based on ChIP-seq information on different chromatin states as provided by the ENCODE project. The location of CSL binding site in the AQP3 gene was analyzed using Mat-inspector software. Right panel: HKCs were processed for ChIP analysis using CSL antibody or non immune IgG. Results are expressed as mean fold of enrichment ± S.E.M. n=2, for each indicated binding site, after immunoprecipitation with CSL antibody or non immune IgG, relative to enrichment for the negative control region.
Anti Mouse Flag M2 Monoclonal Antibody, supplied by Millipore, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/anti-mouse flag-m2 monoclonal antibody/product/Millipore
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti-mouse flag-m2 monoclonal antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Cell Signaling Technology Inc notch1
RT-PCR primers.
Notch1, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/notch1/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
notch1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

95
Cell Signaling Technology Inc jagged1
Effects of RPYD on α-SMA, TGF-β and Notch1 expression in lung tissue. (A) Immunohistochemical staining was used to assess the distribution of α-SMA, TGFβ1, Notch1 expression in lung tissue. The magnification was 200×. Scale bar: 50 μm. (B) Quantitative analysis of α-SMA positive area in airway smooth muscle. (C) Western blot analysis of TGFβ, Smad3, phospho-Smad3, <t>Jagged1,</t> Notch1, Hes1, α-SMA, E-cadherin protein levels with GAPDH as a standard control. (D) Results of band gray scale analysis of these proteins. (E) Quantitative RT-PCR was performed to determine the mRNA levels of TGFβ, Smad3, Notch1, Hes1, α-SMA, E-cadherin in lung tissue. Data are shown as mean ± SD ( n = 8). # P < 0.05 vs. control mice, * P < 0.05 vs. OVA mice.
Jagged1, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/jagged1/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
jagged1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

99
Cell Signaling Technology Inc e cadherin
Effects of RPYD on α-SMA, TGF-β and Notch1 expression in lung tissue. (A) Immunohistochemical staining was used to assess the distribution of α-SMA, TGFβ1, Notch1 expression in lung tissue. The magnification was 200×. Scale bar: 50 μm. (B) Quantitative analysis of α-SMA positive area in airway smooth muscle. (C) Western blot analysis of TGFβ, Smad3, phospho-Smad3, <t>Jagged1,</t> Notch1, Hes1, α-SMA, E-cadherin protein levels with GAPDH as a standard control. (D) Results of band gray scale analysis of these proteins. (E) Quantitative RT-PCR was performed to determine the mRNA levels of TGFβ, Smad3, Notch1, Hes1, α-SMA, E-cadherin in lung tissue. Data are shown as mean ± SD ( n = 8). # P < 0.05 vs. control mice, * P < 0.05 vs. OVA mice.
E Cadherin, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/e cadherin/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
e cadherin - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

97
Cell Signaling Technology Inc smad3
RT-PCR primers.
Smad3, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/smad3/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
smad3 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
97/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

99
Cell Signaling Technology Inc α sma
RT-PCR primers.
α Sma, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/α sma/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
α sma - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


(A) HKCs reverse transfected with siRNAs against CSL or scrambled control were analyzed 1 week later (in differentiating condition) by qRT-PCR and immunoblot of the indicated genes and proteins. mRNA levels were normalized to reference ribosomal gene RPLP0, and presented as mean fold-change over control ± S.E.M. n=3. ** p< 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p<0.0001, Hes1, Keratin 10 and Involucrin were used as indicators of endogenous Notch activity, γ-tubulin served as loading control. (B) Differentiating HKCs were treated with DAPT (10μM) or DMSO control for 72 hours followed by qRT-PCR and immunoblot analysis of the indicated genes and proteins. The analysis was done as in (A). **** p<0.0001, n=3. (C) Proliferating HKCs were infected with retroviruses expressing activated Notch1 or GFP followed, 72 hours later, by qRT-PCR and immunoblot analysis of AQP3. Hey1 was used as an indicator of endogenous Notch activity. The analysis was done as in (A). * p<0.05, *** p<0.001, n=3. (D) Chromatin immuno-precipitation (ChIP) analysis of CSL binding to the regulatory region of the AQP3 gene. Left panel: schematic representation of the AQP3 gene locus based on ChIP-seq information on different chromatin states as provided by the ENCODE project. The location of CSL binding site in the AQP3 gene was analyzed using Mat-inspector software. Right panel: HKCs were processed for ChIP analysis using CSL antibody or non immune IgG. Results are expressed as mean fold of enrichment ± S.E.M. n=2, for each indicated binding site, after immunoprecipitation with CSL antibody or non immune IgG, relative to enrichment for the negative control region.

Journal: PLoS ONE

Article Title: An Aquaporin 3-Notch1 Axis in Keratinocyte Differentiation and Inflammation

doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080179

Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) HKCs reverse transfected with siRNAs against CSL or scrambled control were analyzed 1 week later (in differentiating condition) by qRT-PCR and immunoblot of the indicated genes and proteins. mRNA levels were normalized to reference ribosomal gene RPLP0, and presented as mean fold-change over control ± S.E.M. n=3. ** p< 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p<0.0001, Hes1, Keratin 10 and Involucrin were used as indicators of endogenous Notch activity, γ-tubulin served as loading control. (B) Differentiating HKCs were treated with DAPT (10μM) or DMSO control for 72 hours followed by qRT-PCR and immunoblot analysis of the indicated genes and proteins. The analysis was done as in (A). **** p<0.0001, n=3. (C) Proliferating HKCs were infected with retroviruses expressing activated Notch1 or GFP followed, 72 hours later, by qRT-PCR and immunoblot analysis of AQP3. Hey1 was used as an indicator of endogenous Notch activity. The analysis was done as in (A). * p<0.05, *** p<0.001, n=3. (D) Chromatin immuno-precipitation (ChIP) analysis of CSL binding to the regulatory region of the AQP3 gene. Left panel: schematic representation of the AQP3 gene locus based on ChIP-seq information on different chromatin states as provided by the ENCODE project. The location of CSL binding site in the AQP3 gene was analyzed using Mat-inspector software. Right panel: HKCs were processed for ChIP analysis using CSL antibody or non immune IgG. Results are expressed as mean fold of enrichment ± S.E.M. n=2, for each indicated binding site, after immunoprecipitation with CSL antibody or non immune IgG, relative to enrichment for the negative control region.

Article Snippet: The processed chromatin was used for ChIP assays using the ChIP assay kit (Millipore) with CSL antibody (5313) from Cell Signaling.

Techniques: Transfection, Control, Quantitative RT-PCR, Western Blot, Activity Assay, Infection, Expressing, Chromatin Immunoprecipitation, Binding Assay, ChIP-sequencing, Software, Immunoprecipitation, Negative Control

(A) HKCs reverse transfected with siRNAs against CSL or scrambled control were analyzed 1 week later (in differentiating condition) by qRT-PCR and immunoblot of the indicated genes and proteins. mRNA levels were normalized to reference ribosomal gene RPLP0, and presented as mean fold-change over control ± S.E.M. n=3. ** p< 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p<0.0001, Hes1, Keratin 10 and Involucrin were used as indicators of endogenous Notch activity, γ-tubulin served as loading control. (B) Differentiating HKCs were treated with DAPT (10μM) or DMSO control for 72 hours followed by qRT-PCR and immunoblot analysis of the indicated genes and proteins. The analysis was done as in (A). **** p<0.0001, n=3. (C) Proliferating HKCs were infected with retroviruses expressing activated Notch1 or GFP followed, 72 hours later, by qRT-PCR and immunoblot analysis of AQP3. Hey1 was used as an indicator of endogenous Notch activity. The analysis was done as in (A). * p<0.05, *** p<0.001, n=3. (D) Chromatin immuno-precipitation (ChIP) analysis of CSL binding to the regulatory region of the AQP3 gene. Left panel: schematic representation of the AQP3 gene locus based on ChIP-seq information on different chromatin states as provided by the ENCODE project. The location of CSL binding site in the AQP3 gene was analyzed using Mat-inspector software. Right panel: HKCs were processed for ChIP analysis using CSL antibody or non immune IgG. Results are expressed as mean fold of enrichment ± S.E.M. n=2, for each indicated binding site, after immunoprecipitation with CSL antibody or non immune IgG, relative to enrichment for the negative control region.

Journal: PLoS ONE

Article Title: An Aquaporin 3-Notch1 Axis in Keratinocyte Differentiation and Inflammation

doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080179

Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) HKCs reverse transfected with siRNAs against CSL or scrambled control were analyzed 1 week later (in differentiating condition) by qRT-PCR and immunoblot of the indicated genes and proteins. mRNA levels were normalized to reference ribosomal gene RPLP0, and presented as mean fold-change over control ± S.E.M. n=3. ** p< 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p<0.0001, Hes1, Keratin 10 and Involucrin were used as indicators of endogenous Notch activity, γ-tubulin served as loading control. (B) Differentiating HKCs were treated with DAPT (10μM) or DMSO control for 72 hours followed by qRT-PCR and immunoblot analysis of the indicated genes and proteins. The analysis was done as in (A). **** p<0.0001, n=3. (C) Proliferating HKCs were infected with retroviruses expressing activated Notch1 or GFP followed, 72 hours later, by qRT-PCR and immunoblot analysis of AQP3. Hey1 was used as an indicator of endogenous Notch activity. The analysis was done as in (A). * p<0.05, *** p<0.001, n=3. (D) Chromatin immuno-precipitation (ChIP) analysis of CSL binding to the regulatory region of the AQP3 gene. Left panel: schematic representation of the AQP3 gene locus based on ChIP-seq information on different chromatin states as provided by the ENCODE project. The location of CSL binding site in the AQP3 gene was analyzed using Mat-inspector software. Right panel: HKCs were processed for ChIP analysis using CSL antibody or non immune IgG. Results are expressed as mean fold of enrichment ± S.E.M. n=2, for each indicated binding site, after immunoprecipitation with CSL antibody or non immune IgG, relative to enrichment for the negative control region.

Article Snippet: The processed chromatin was used for ChIP assays using the ChIP assay kit (Millipore) with CSL antibody (5313) from Cell Signaling.

Techniques: Transfection, Control, Quantitative RT-PCR, Western Blot, Activity Assay, Infection, Expressing, Chromatin Immunoprecipitation, Binding Assay, ChIP-sequencing, Software, Immunoprecipitation, Negative Control

RT-PCR primers.

Journal: Frontiers in Physiology

Article Title: Recombinant Pyrin Domain Protein Attenuates Airway Inflammation and Alleviates Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition by Inhibiting Crosstalk Between TGFβ1 and Notch1 Signaling in Chronic Asthmatic Mice

doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.559470

Figure Lengend Snippet: RT-PCR primers.

Article Snippet: The antibodies of phosphor-Smad3 (#9520), Smad3 (#9523), Jagged1 (#70109), Notch1 (#3608), NICD (#4147), Hes1 (#11988), CSL (#5313), α-SMA (#19245), E-cadherin (#3195), GAPDH (#5174), and PARP (#9532) were all purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (Beverly, MA, United States).

Techniques:

Effects of RPYD on α-SMA, TGF-β and Notch1 expression in lung tissue. (A) Immunohistochemical staining was used to assess the distribution of α-SMA, TGFβ1, Notch1 expression in lung tissue. The magnification was 200×. Scale bar: 50 μm. (B) Quantitative analysis of α-SMA positive area in airway smooth muscle. (C) Western blot analysis of TGFβ, Smad3, phospho-Smad3, Jagged1, Notch1, Hes1, α-SMA, E-cadherin protein levels with GAPDH as a standard control. (D) Results of band gray scale analysis of these proteins. (E) Quantitative RT-PCR was performed to determine the mRNA levels of TGFβ, Smad3, Notch1, Hes1, α-SMA, E-cadherin in lung tissue. Data are shown as mean ± SD ( n = 8). # P < 0.05 vs. control mice, * P < 0.05 vs. OVA mice.

Journal: Frontiers in Physiology

Article Title: Recombinant Pyrin Domain Protein Attenuates Airway Inflammation and Alleviates Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition by Inhibiting Crosstalk Between TGFβ1 and Notch1 Signaling in Chronic Asthmatic Mice

doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.559470

Figure Lengend Snippet: Effects of RPYD on α-SMA, TGF-β and Notch1 expression in lung tissue. (A) Immunohistochemical staining was used to assess the distribution of α-SMA, TGFβ1, Notch1 expression in lung tissue. The magnification was 200×. Scale bar: 50 μm. (B) Quantitative analysis of α-SMA positive area in airway smooth muscle. (C) Western blot analysis of TGFβ, Smad3, phospho-Smad3, Jagged1, Notch1, Hes1, α-SMA, E-cadherin protein levels with GAPDH as a standard control. (D) Results of band gray scale analysis of these proteins. (E) Quantitative RT-PCR was performed to determine the mRNA levels of TGFβ, Smad3, Notch1, Hes1, α-SMA, E-cadherin in lung tissue. Data are shown as mean ± SD ( n = 8). # P < 0.05 vs. control mice, * P < 0.05 vs. OVA mice.

Article Snippet: The antibodies of phosphor-Smad3 (#9520), Smad3 (#9523), Jagged1 (#70109), Notch1 (#3608), NICD (#4147), Hes1 (#11988), CSL (#5313), α-SMA (#19245), E-cadherin (#3195), GAPDH (#5174), and PARP (#9532) were all purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (Beverly, MA, United States).

Techniques: Expressing, Immunohistochemical staining, Staining, Western Blot, Control, Quantitative RT-PCR

Effects of RPYD on Jagged1/Notch1 signaling in bronchial epithelial BEAS-2B cells induced by TGFβ1. BEAS-2B cells were treated as described in section “Materials and Methods.” (A) Western blot was used to detect the protein expression of Jagged1, Notch1, Hes1, α-SMA and E-cadherin. (B) Relative level of each protein. All data were shown as mean ± SD ( n = 3). # P < 0.05 vs. Control group, * P < 0.05 vs. TGFβ1 stimulation group.

Journal: Frontiers in Physiology

Article Title: Recombinant Pyrin Domain Protein Attenuates Airway Inflammation and Alleviates Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition by Inhibiting Crosstalk Between TGFβ1 and Notch1 Signaling in Chronic Asthmatic Mice

doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.559470

Figure Lengend Snippet: Effects of RPYD on Jagged1/Notch1 signaling in bronchial epithelial BEAS-2B cells induced by TGFβ1. BEAS-2B cells were treated as described in section “Materials and Methods.” (A) Western blot was used to detect the protein expression of Jagged1, Notch1, Hes1, α-SMA and E-cadherin. (B) Relative level of each protein. All data were shown as mean ± SD ( n = 3). # P < 0.05 vs. Control group, * P < 0.05 vs. TGFβ1 stimulation group.

Article Snippet: The antibodies of phosphor-Smad3 (#9520), Smad3 (#9523), Jagged1 (#70109), Notch1 (#3608), NICD (#4147), Hes1 (#11988), CSL (#5313), α-SMA (#19245), E-cadherin (#3195), GAPDH (#5174), and PARP (#9532) were all purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (Beverly, MA, United States).

Techniques: Western Blot, Expressing, Control

Effects of RPYD on α-SMA, TGF-β and Notch1 expression in lung tissue. (A) Immunohistochemical staining was used to assess the distribution of α-SMA, TGFβ1, Notch1 expression in lung tissue. The magnification was 200×. Scale bar: 50 μm. (B) Quantitative analysis of α-SMA positive area in airway smooth muscle. (C) Western blot analysis of TGFβ, Smad3, phospho-Smad3, Jagged1, Notch1, Hes1, α-SMA, E-cadherin protein levels with GAPDH as a standard control. (D) Results of band gray scale analysis of these proteins. (E) Quantitative RT-PCR was performed to determine the mRNA levels of TGFβ, Smad3, Notch1, Hes1, α-SMA, E-cadherin in lung tissue. Data are shown as mean ± SD ( n = 8). # P < 0.05 vs. control mice, * P < 0.05 vs. OVA mice.

Journal: Frontiers in Physiology

Article Title: Recombinant Pyrin Domain Protein Attenuates Airway Inflammation and Alleviates Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition by Inhibiting Crosstalk Between TGFβ1 and Notch1 Signaling in Chronic Asthmatic Mice

doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.559470

Figure Lengend Snippet: Effects of RPYD on α-SMA, TGF-β and Notch1 expression in lung tissue. (A) Immunohistochemical staining was used to assess the distribution of α-SMA, TGFβ1, Notch1 expression in lung tissue. The magnification was 200×. Scale bar: 50 μm. (B) Quantitative analysis of α-SMA positive area in airway smooth muscle. (C) Western blot analysis of TGFβ, Smad3, phospho-Smad3, Jagged1, Notch1, Hes1, α-SMA, E-cadherin protein levels with GAPDH as a standard control. (D) Results of band gray scale analysis of these proteins. (E) Quantitative RT-PCR was performed to determine the mRNA levels of TGFβ, Smad3, Notch1, Hes1, α-SMA, E-cadherin in lung tissue. Data are shown as mean ± SD ( n = 8). # P < 0.05 vs. control mice, * P < 0.05 vs. OVA mice.

Article Snippet: The antibodies of phosphor-Smad3 (#9520), Smad3 (#9523), Jagged1 (#70109), Notch1 (#3608), NICD (#4147), Hes1 (#11988), CSL (#5313), α-SMA (#19245), E-cadherin (#3195), GAPDH (#5174), and PARP (#9532) were all purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (Beverly, MA, United States).

Techniques: Expressing, Immunohistochemical staining, Staining, Western Blot, Control, Quantitative RT-PCR

Effects of RPYD on Jagged1/Notch1 signaling in bronchial epithelial BEAS-2B cells induced by TGFβ1. BEAS-2B cells were treated as described in section “Materials and Methods.” (A) Western blot was used to detect the protein expression of Jagged1, Notch1, Hes1, α-SMA and E-cadherin. (B) Relative level of each protein. All data were shown as mean ± SD ( n = 3). # P < 0.05 vs. Control group, * P < 0.05 vs. TGFβ1 stimulation group.

Journal: Frontiers in Physiology

Article Title: Recombinant Pyrin Domain Protein Attenuates Airway Inflammation and Alleviates Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition by Inhibiting Crosstalk Between TGFβ1 and Notch1 Signaling in Chronic Asthmatic Mice

doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.559470

Figure Lengend Snippet: Effects of RPYD on Jagged1/Notch1 signaling in bronchial epithelial BEAS-2B cells induced by TGFβ1. BEAS-2B cells were treated as described in section “Materials and Methods.” (A) Western blot was used to detect the protein expression of Jagged1, Notch1, Hes1, α-SMA and E-cadherin. (B) Relative level of each protein. All data were shown as mean ± SD ( n = 3). # P < 0.05 vs. Control group, * P < 0.05 vs. TGFβ1 stimulation group.

Article Snippet: The antibodies of phosphor-Smad3 (#9520), Smad3 (#9523), Jagged1 (#70109), Notch1 (#3608), NICD (#4147), Hes1 (#11988), CSL (#5313), α-SMA (#19245), E-cadherin (#3195), GAPDH (#5174), and PARP (#9532) were all purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (Beverly, MA, United States).

Techniques: Western Blot, Expressing, Control

RT-PCR primers.

Journal: Frontiers in Physiology

Article Title: Recombinant Pyrin Domain Protein Attenuates Airway Inflammation and Alleviates Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition by Inhibiting Crosstalk Between TGFβ1 and Notch1 Signaling in Chronic Asthmatic Mice

doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.559470

Figure Lengend Snippet: RT-PCR primers.

Article Snippet: The antibodies of phosphor-Smad3 (#9520), Smad3 (#9523), Jagged1 (#70109), Notch1 (#3608), NICD (#4147), Hes1 (#11988), CSL (#5313), α-SMA (#19245), E-cadherin (#3195), GAPDH (#5174), and PARP (#9532) were all purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (Beverly, MA, United States).

Techniques:

Effects of RPYD on α-SMA, TGF-β and Notch1 expression in lung tissue. (A) Immunohistochemical staining was used to assess the distribution of α-SMA, TGFβ1, Notch1 expression in lung tissue. The magnification was 200×. Scale bar: 50 μm. (B) Quantitative analysis of α-SMA positive area in airway smooth muscle. (C) Western blot analysis of TGFβ, Smad3, phospho-Smad3, Jagged1, Notch1, Hes1, α-SMA, E-cadherin protein levels with GAPDH as a standard control. (D) Results of band gray scale analysis of these proteins. (E) Quantitative RT-PCR was performed to determine the mRNA levels of TGFβ, Smad3, Notch1, Hes1, α-SMA, E-cadherin in lung tissue. Data are shown as mean ± SD ( n = 8). # P < 0.05 vs. control mice, * P < 0.05 vs. OVA mice.

Journal: Frontiers in Physiology

Article Title: Recombinant Pyrin Domain Protein Attenuates Airway Inflammation and Alleviates Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition by Inhibiting Crosstalk Between TGFβ1 and Notch1 Signaling in Chronic Asthmatic Mice

doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.559470

Figure Lengend Snippet: Effects of RPYD on α-SMA, TGF-β and Notch1 expression in lung tissue. (A) Immunohistochemical staining was used to assess the distribution of α-SMA, TGFβ1, Notch1 expression in lung tissue. The magnification was 200×. Scale bar: 50 μm. (B) Quantitative analysis of α-SMA positive area in airway smooth muscle. (C) Western blot analysis of TGFβ, Smad3, phospho-Smad3, Jagged1, Notch1, Hes1, α-SMA, E-cadherin protein levels with GAPDH as a standard control. (D) Results of band gray scale analysis of these proteins. (E) Quantitative RT-PCR was performed to determine the mRNA levels of TGFβ, Smad3, Notch1, Hes1, α-SMA, E-cadherin in lung tissue. Data are shown as mean ± SD ( n = 8). # P < 0.05 vs. control mice, * P < 0.05 vs. OVA mice.

Article Snippet: The antibodies of phosphor-Smad3 (#9520), Smad3 (#9523), Jagged1 (#70109), Notch1 (#3608), NICD (#4147), Hes1 (#11988), CSL (#5313), α-SMA (#19245), E-cadherin (#3195), GAPDH (#5174), and PARP (#9532) were all purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (Beverly, MA, United States).

Techniques: Expressing, Immunohistochemical staining, Staining, Western Blot, Control, Quantitative RT-PCR

Effects of RPYD on TGFβ1/Smad3 signaling in bronchial epithelial BEAS-2B cells induced by TGFβ1. BEAS-2B cells were treated as described in section “Materials and Methods.” (A) Western blot was used to detect the protein expression of phosphorylated Smad3, Smad3, α-SMA and E-cadherin. (B) Relative level of each protein. All data were shown as mean ± SD ( n = 3). # P < 0.05 vs. Control group, * P < 0.05 vs. TGFβ1 stimulation group. (C) Western blot results of cytosol and nuclear expression of Smad3. (D) Relative level of cytosol and nuclear Smad3.

Journal: Frontiers in Physiology

Article Title: Recombinant Pyrin Domain Protein Attenuates Airway Inflammation and Alleviates Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition by Inhibiting Crosstalk Between TGFβ1 and Notch1 Signaling in Chronic Asthmatic Mice

doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.559470

Figure Lengend Snippet: Effects of RPYD on TGFβ1/Smad3 signaling in bronchial epithelial BEAS-2B cells induced by TGFβ1. BEAS-2B cells were treated as described in section “Materials and Methods.” (A) Western blot was used to detect the protein expression of phosphorylated Smad3, Smad3, α-SMA and E-cadherin. (B) Relative level of each protein. All data were shown as mean ± SD ( n = 3). # P < 0.05 vs. Control group, * P < 0.05 vs. TGFβ1 stimulation group. (C) Western blot results of cytosol and nuclear expression of Smad3. (D) Relative level of cytosol and nuclear Smad3.

Article Snippet: The antibodies of phosphor-Smad3 (#9520), Smad3 (#9523), Jagged1 (#70109), Notch1 (#3608), NICD (#4147), Hes1 (#11988), CSL (#5313), α-SMA (#19245), E-cadherin (#3195), GAPDH (#5174), and PARP (#9532) were all purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (Beverly, MA, United States).

Techniques: Western Blot, Expressing, Control

NICD overexpression promotes the phosphorylation and nuclear translocation of Smad3. (A) Expression of NICD in transfected cells was verified by RT-PCR and western blotting after BEAS-2B cells were infected with lentivirus for 24 h. All data were shown as mean ± SD ( n = 3). # P < 0.05 vs. Control group. (B) Western blot was used to detect phospho-Smad3, Smad3, and NICD protein expression. The band intensity of the protein was expressed as a ratio to GAPDH. All data were shown as mean ± SD ( n = 3). # P < 0.05 vs. Control group, * P < 0.05 vs. TGFβ1 stimulation group. (C) Western blot was used to detect Smad3, CSL, and Hes1 protein expression. The band intensity was expressed as a ratio to GAPDH or PARP. All data were shown as mean ± SD ( n = 3). # P < 0.05 vs. TGFβ1 stimulation group.

Journal: Frontiers in Physiology

Article Title: Recombinant Pyrin Domain Protein Attenuates Airway Inflammation and Alleviates Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition by Inhibiting Crosstalk Between TGFβ1 and Notch1 Signaling in Chronic Asthmatic Mice

doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.559470

Figure Lengend Snippet: NICD overexpression promotes the phosphorylation and nuclear translocation of Smad3. (A) Expression of NICD in transfected cells was verified by RT-PCR and western blotting after BEAS-2B cells were infected with lentivirus for 24 h. All data were shown as mean ± SD ( n = 3). # P < 0.05 vs. Control group. (B) Western blot was used to detect phospho-Smad3, Smad3, and NICD protein expression. The band intensity of the protein was expressed as a ratio to GAPDH. All data were shown as mean ± SD ( n = 3). # P < 0.05 vs. Control group, * P < 0.05 vs. TGFβ1 stimulation group. (C) Western blot was used to detect Smad3, CSL, and Hes1 protein expression. The band intensity was expressed as a ratio to GAPDH or PARP. All data were shown as mean ± SD ( n = 3). # P < 0.05 vs. TGFβ1 stimulation group.

Article Snippet: The antibodies of phosphor-Smad3 (#9520), Smad3 (#9523), Jagged1 (#70109), Notch1 (#3608), NICD (#4147), Hes1 (#11988), CSL (#5313), α-SMA (#19245), E-cadherin (#3195), GAPDH (#5174), and PARP (#9532) were all purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (Beverly, MA, United States).

Techniques: Over Expression, Phospho-proteomics, Translocation Assay, Expressing, Transfection, Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction, Western Blot, Infection, Control

Smad3 siRNA reduces the level of Smad3 phosphorylation and decreases the protein expression of Hes1. (A) The specific knockdown of Smad3 by siRNA was verified by RT-PCR and western blotting. All data were shown as mean ± SD ( n = 3). # P < 0.05 vs. Control group. (B) Western blot was used to detect phospho-Smad3, Smad3, Hes1, and CSL protein expression. The band intensity was expressed as a ratio to GAPDH or PARP. All data were shown as mean ± SD ( n = 3). # P < 0.05 vs. Control group, * P < 0.05 vs. TGFβ1 stimulation group.

Journal: Frontiers in Physiology

Article Title: Recombinant Pyrin Domain Protein Attenuates Airway Inflammation and Alleviates Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition by Inhibiting Crosstalk Between TGFβ1 and Notch1 Signaling in Chronic Asthmatic Mice

doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.559470

Figure Lengend Snippet: Smad3 siRNA reduces the level of Smad3 phosphorylation and decreases the protein expression of Hes1. (A) The specific knockdown of Smad3 by siRNA was verified by RT-PCR and western blotting. All data were shown as mean ± SD ( n = 3). # P < 0.05 vs. Control group. (B) Western blot was used to detect phospho-Smad3, Smad3, Hes1, and CSL protein expression. The band intensity was expressed as a ratio to GAPDH or PARP. All data were shown as mean ± SD ( n = 3). # P < 0.05 vs. Control group, * P < 0.05 vs. TGFβ1 stimulation group.

Article Snippet: The antibodies of phosphor-Smad3 (#9520), Smad3 (#9523), Jagged1 (#70109), Notch1 (#3608), NICD (#4147), Hes1 (#11988), CSL (#5313), α-SMA (#19245), E-cadherin (#3195), GAPDH (#5174), and PARP (#9532) were all purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (Beverly, MA, United States).

Techniques: Phospho-proteomics, Expressing, Knockdown, Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction, Western Blot, Control

RT-PCR primers.

Journal: Frontiers in Physiology

Article Title: Recombinant Pyrin Domain Protein Attenuates Airway Inflammation and Alleviates Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition by Inhibiting Crosstalk Between TGFβ1 and Notch1 Signaling in Chronic Asthmatic Mice

doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.559470

Figure Lengend Snippet: RT-PCR primers.

Article Snippet: The antibodies of phosphor-Smad3 (#9520), Smad3 (#9523), Jagged1 (#70109), Notch1 (#3608), NICD (#4147), Hes1 (#11988), CSL (#5313), α-SMA (#19245), E-cadherin (#3195), GAPDH (#5174), and PARP (#9532) were all purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (Beverly, MA, United States).

Techniques: